Archive for March, 2008

Empirical Evidence: Meat & Retardation

In regards to my previous article on how scientists have discovered a direct link between eating meat and a drop in IQ, I bring you here unquestionable scientific data. These damming findings which the meat industry has tried to hide show once and for all that the longer to you eat flesh the lower your IQ becomes. To quote the eminent professor Irving:

“Our findings after years of tests on rats and students confirm that if your eat meat the chances are you’re a dam retard. I would go as far to say out of the 100 meat eating humans we tested in our trials they were all dumb and we have the data to prove it.”


Years of eating meat.


March 23, 2008 at 12:39 pm 2 comments

Rain Without Thunder

This was taken in part from a book review on Amazon of Gary L. Francione’s book “Rain with out Thunder”.

In a nutshell, Francione’s central thesis in _Rain Without Thunder_ is as follows:

In everyday language with respect to human animals, the word “welfare” has very good connotations. However, in the areas of _law_ and _institutional policy_ with respect to non-human animals, words like “welfare,” “humane,” “care,” “unnecessary suffering,” and so on only mean _one_ thing. Namely, they mean that the interests of non-human animals will be protected only to the extent necessary to exploit them in an economically efficient manner. For example, in law and policy, the welfare of a pig not to starve is protected because it is necessary to feed the pig in order to get her or his meat. The same is necessarily true of every animal welfare law and regulation. Therefore, any advocacy that attempts to achieve animal rights and the abolition of animal exploitation in the long-term by using the supposedly short-term strategy of trying to pass welfare regulations achieves only _one_ thing. Namely, if those measures are implemented, it will be further ensured that the only interests of non-human animals that will ever be protected are those that are required to exploit them efficiently. In other words, the supposed “success” of implementing a welfare measure only further ensures that the interests of other animals that are not required to exploit them efficiently will *always* be violated in the most abhorrent ways imaginable. In short, welfare measures *only* harm non-human animals and never help them. ByJeff Perz

People are god dam bullies! You know you are, you meat eating, egg sucking, fecal freaks! Leave the animals alone and pick on someone who can fight back you sick farm abusing, battery egg buying…………….gloooooooooooooooooooooooom!

March 19, 2008 at 9:25 am Leave a comment

March 2008
« Feb   Apr »

Gloomy Tweets